Sat Mar 8 5:07PM - 13 days, 17 hours left in session

House Memorial 27

Anti-Donation Clause Interim Committee Work [view on nmlegis.gov]

Financial Analysis: FIR


Sponsors
Rep. Linda Serrato 45 Santa Fe
Rep. Joseph Franklin Hernandez 4 San Juan

Status
On Speaker's Table


"Official" History

This is the official nmlegis action history. I'm doing my best to translate the LONG/WEIRD-STRING to something less gibberishy. And before you ask, no, the "Legis Day" number has no mapping to the real world.

Actions: [8] HGEIC-HGEIC [14] DP-T

Legis DayActionDetails
8 referred HGEIC
8 sent HGEIC
14 passed HGEIC (view committee report) DP 5-2; nays: Mejia, Zamora
14 sent Speaker's Table


This table shows bill actions detected on Ed's system, using heuristics that may not be 100% accurate and which may not reflect the "official" nmlegis chronology. It is probably more than you care to know.

Feb 21 filed: [Prefiled by Linda Serrato; not yet on nmlegis]
[new]
sent to HGEIC
title: '[prefiled by Linda Serrato; Not Yet on Nmlegis]' -> 'Anti-Donation Clause Interim Committee Work'
actions: 'HPREF' -> '[8] HGEIC-HGEIC'
new sponsor: Linda Serrato
Feb 22 new sponsor: Joseph Franklin Hernandez
Mar 3 scheduled for HGEIC on Fri Mar 7, 08:30
Mar 7 passed HGEIC; sent to Speaker's Table
actions: '[8] HGEIC-HGEIC' -> '+ [14] DP-T'
on House calendar for Sat Mar 8, 12:00

HOUSE MEMORIAL 27

57th legislature - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - first session, 2025

INTRODUCED BY

Linda Serrato and Joseph Franklin Hernandez

 

 

 

 

 

A MEMORIAL

REQUESTING THE NEW MEXICO LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL TO TASK AN INTERIM COMMITTEE TO ASSESS THE BEST METHODS TO IMPLEMENT THE EXCEPTION THE VOTERS APPROVED TO ARTICLE 9, SECTION 14 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF NEW MEXICO, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE ANTI-DONATION CLAUSE, FOR THE PROVISION OF STATE ASSISTANCE FOR ESSENTIAL SERVICES AND TO DEVELOP LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS BASED ON THE COMMITTEE'S FINDINGS FOR THE 2026 LEGISLATIVE SESSION.

 

     WHEREAS, many New Mexico communities have struggled to acquire essential utility services for their residents, including internet, electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater services; and

     WHEREAS, utility providers in New Mexico sometimes find the capital costs of installing utility cables, lines, pipes and other utility infrastructure to be prohibitive for some communities due to their geography, geology, per capita disposable income, population density or other factors; and

     WHEREAS, building up the funding to install the final leg, commonly referred to as the "last mile", of an electrical network, a telecommunications network chain or a pipeline system for gas, water or wastewater that physically reaches residential homes has quite often proved to be an insurmountable obstacle for communities to have access to these essential services;

     WHEREAS, in 2022, the voters of New Mexico approved an exception to Article 9, Section 14 of the constitution of New Mexico, commonly known as the "anti-donation clause", to allow the state to expend funds or resources for the purpose of providing essential services primarily for residential purposes and defined "essential services" as "infrastructure that allows internet, energy, water, wastewater or other similar services as provided by law"; and

     WHEREAS, the exception the voters approved included a requirement for state expenditures to provide essential services pursuant to implementing legislation that includes "safeguards to protect public money and other public resources"; and

     WHEREAS, electricity, internet, natural gas, water and wastewater services meet very different human and community needs, operate under very different regulatory structures and have very different types of supporting infrastructure; and

     WHEREAS, developing legislation to implement the exception and safeguard public money raises several issues that need to be examined with input from varying perspectives across the state;

     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the New Mexico legislative council be requested to task an interim committee to:

          A. examine the following questions:

                (1) whether a bureau, a department, an instrumentality or other type of entity would be most efficient and accountable to provide assistance to build infrastructure for internet, energy, water, wastewater or other similar services;

                (2) whether a single entity to assist all essential services or several separate public entities, each specifically dedicated to a particular type of essential service, would be more efficient and provide greater accountability to safeguard public money and other public resources;

                (3) whether the best pathway to implement an assistance program for essential services is to establish a program to provide assistance for one type of essential service to act as a prototype to develop best practices for providing assistance for other essential services or to implement a broad spectrum assistance program for all essential services;

                (4) whether the criteria for essential services should be based on the poverty levels in a community, the percentage of households without a particular utility service or some other condition within a community;

                (5) whether the provision of assistance for essential services should be conditioned on some level of matching funding from local governments;

                (6) what would be the most effective method to ensure accountability for a state assistance program for essential services, including whether legislative oversight would be best accomplished by tasking oversight to an existing interim committee or establishing a new interim committee; and

                (7) what would be a reasonable annual budget for an assistance program for essential services; and

          B. develop legislative proposals for the 2026 legislative session to implement an assistance program for essential services based on the committee's findings; and

     BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be transmitted to the members of the New Mexico legislative council and the director of the legislative council service.

- 4 -


Legislators: Democratic sponsorship Republican sponsorship Bipartisan sponsorship This indicates your legislator
(Highlights bills they sponsor, committees they sit in)
Bill Rows: Active -- hearings scheduled (NN) - sequence number in agenda Inactive -- no hearings scheduled
Bill Progress: Passed Failed Vote Tabled
Incomplete Data: Heard(?)
(was scheduled for hearing recently)
Heard Long Ago
(was scheduled for hearing many days ago)
(There is very little I can do about these because nmlegis.gov does not report real-time results)

This site pulls data from nmlegis.gov but is in no way associated with that site or the state of New Mexico. It's just a labor of love by Ed.

Powered by Mojolicious. Tracking software is fully Open Source. See About page for more info, and for a list of recent changes.