Sat Mar 8 4:53PM - 13 days, 18 hours left in session

House Bill 10

RLD Cannabis Enforcement [view on nmlegis.gov]

Financial Analysis: FIR


Sponsors
Rep. Doreen Y. Gallegos 52 Doña Ana
Rep. Javier Martínez 11 Bernalillo
Rep. Gail Armstrong 49 Catron, Sierra, Socorro & Valencia
Rep. Marian Matthews 27 Bernalillo
Rep. Art De La Cruz 12 Bernalillo

Status
HousePassed, Feb 20, 68-1
SJC[Referred, not scheduled]
SFC


"Official" History

This is the official nmlegis action history. I'm doing my best to translate the LONG/WEIRD-STRING to something less gibberishy. And before you ask, no, the "Legis Day" number has no mapping to the real world.

Actions: [2] HCEDC/HJC-HCEDC [3] DNP-CS/DP-HJC [5] DP [8] PASSED/H (68-1)- SJC/SFC-SJC

Legis DayActionDetails
2 referred HCEDC/HJC
2 sent HCEDC
3 passed HCEDC (view committee report) DNP-CS/DP ( view committee sub) 11-0
3 sent HJC
5 passed HJC (view committee report) DP 11-0
8 passed House 68-1
8 referred SJC/SFC
8 sent SJC


Abeyta, Michelle Pauleneyes Pettigrew, Randall T.no
Anaya, Mariannayes  
Anyanonu, Janelleyes  
Armstrong, Gailyes  
Baca, Brian G.yes  
Block, Johnyes  
Borrego, Cynthiayes  
Brown, Cathrynn N.yes  
Cadena, Micaela Larayes  
Cates, Kathleenyes  
Chandler, Christineyes  
Chatfield, Jackyes  
Chavez, Nicoleyes  
Chávez, Eleanoryes  
Cullen, Catherine J.yes  
De La Cruz, Artyes  
Dixon, Meredith A.yes  
Dow, Rebeccayes  
Duncan, Markyes  
Ferrary, Joanne J.yes  
Gallegos, Doreen Y.yes  
García, Miguel P.yes  
Garratt, Joyyes  
Gonzales, Anitayes  
Gurrola, Yanirayes  
Hall II, William A.yes  
Henry, Jonathan A.yes  
Hernandez, Joseph Franklinyes  
Hernandez, Joshua N.yes  
Herndon, Pamelyayes  
Herrera, Susan K.yes  
Hochman-Vigil, Dayanyes  
Johnson, D. Wondayes  
Jones, Jeniferyes  
Lara, Raymundoyes  
Lente, Derrick J.yes  
Little, Charlotteyes  
Lord, Stefaniyes  
Lujan, Tara L.yes  
Lundstrom, Patricia A.yes  
Martinez, Alan T.yes  
Martínez, Javieryes  
Mason, Jimmy G.yes  
Matthews, Marianyes  
McQueen, Matthewyes  
Mejia, Angelitayes  
Mirabal Moya, Tanyayes  
Montoya, Rodyes  
Murphy, Mark B.yes  
Ortez, Kristinayes  
Parajón, Cristinayes  
Reeb, Andreayes  
Romero, Andreayes  
Romero, G. Andrésyes  
Roybal Caballero, Patriciayes  
Rubio, Angelicayes  
Sanchez, Josephyes  
Sariñana, Debra M.yes  
Sena Cortez, Elaineyes  
Serrato, Lindayes  
Silva, Sarahyes  
Small, Nathan P.yes  
Szczepanski, Reenayes  
Terrazas, Luis M.yes  
Thomson, Elizabeth "Liz"yes  
Torres-Velásquez, E. Dianeyes  
Vincent, Harlanyes  
Zamora, Martin R.yes  


This table shows bill actions detected on Ed's system, using heuristics that may not be 100% accurate and which may not reflect the "official" nmlegis chronology. It is probably more than you care to know.

Jan 22 filed: [Prefiled by Doreen Y. Gallegos et al; not yet on nmlegis]
[new]
sent to HCEDC
title: '[prefiled by Doreen Y. Gallegos Et Al; Not Yet on Nmlegis]' -> 'RLD Cannabis Enforcement'
actions: 'HPREF' -> '[2] HCEDC/HJC-HCEDC'
new sponsor: Doreen Y. Gallegos
new sponsor: Javier Martínez
new sponsor: Gail Armstrong
new sponsor: Marian Matthews
new sponsor: Art De La Cruz
Jan 23 scheduled for HCEDC on Wed Jan 29, 13:30
Jan 27 moved from HCEDC 01-29 13:30 to 2025-01-31 13:30
Jan 28 removed from HCEDC agenda Wed Jan 29, 13:30
added to HCEDC agenda on Fri Jan 31, 13:30
Jan 30 removed from HCEDC 01-31
rescheduled for HCEDC on Mon Feb 3, 13:30
Feb 2 removed from HCEDC agenda Mon Feb 3, 13:30
added to HCEDC agenda on Mon Feb 3, 13:30
Feb 4 passed HCEDC; sent to HJC
actions: '[2] HCEDC/HJC-HCEDC' -> '[2] HCEDC/HJC-HCEDC [3] DNP-CS/DP-HJC'
Feb 7 added to HJC agenda on Mon Feb 10, 13:30
Feb 11 passed HJC; sent to Speaker's Table
actions: '[2] HCEDC/HJC-HCEDC [3] DNP-CS/DP-HJC' -> '[2] HCEDC/HJC-HCEDC [3] DNP-CS/DP-HJC [5] DP-T'
on House calendar for Wed Feb 12, 10:30
Feb 12 actions: '[2] HCEDC/HJC-HCEDC [3] DNP-CS/DP-HJC [5] DP-T' -> '[2] HCEDC/HJC-HCEDC [3] DNP-CS/DP-HJC [5] DP'
on House calendar for Thu Feb 13, 10:30
Feb 13 on House calendar for Fri Feb 14, 10:30
Feb 14 on House calendar for Sat Feb 15, 14:00
Feb 15 on House calendar for Mon Feb 17, 10:30
Feb 17 on House calendar for Tue Feb 18, 10:30
Feb 18 on House calendar for Wed Feb 19, 10:30
Feb 19 on House calendar for Thu Feb 20, 10:30
Feb 20 passed House
actions: '[2] HCEDC/HJC-HCEDC [3] DNP-CS/DP-HJC [5] DP' -> '[2] HCEDC/HJC-HCEDC [3] DNP-CS/DP-HJC [5] DP [8] PASSED/H (68-1)'
Feb 21 referred to SJC/SFC; sent to SJC
actions: '[2] HCEDC/HJC-HCEDC [3] DNP-CS/DP-HJC [5] DP [8] PASSED/H (68-1)' -> '[2] HCEDC/HJC-HCEDC [3] DNP-CS/DP-HJC [5] DP [8] PASSED/H (68-1)- SJC/SFC-SJC'

Committee Substitution!

Showing the House Commerce & Economic Development Committee substitution below. For the original as introduced, please refer to nmlegis.


HOUSE COMMERCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR

HOUSE BILL 10

57th legislature - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - first session, 2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AN ACT

RELATING TO LAW ENFORCEMENT; ESTABLISHING THE ENFORCEMENT BUREAU WITHIN THE REGULATION AND LICENSING DEPARTMENT; ENACTING A NEW SECTION OF THE CANNABIS REGULATION ACT PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT; PROVIDING PENALTIES.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:

     SECTION 1. Section 9-16-1 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1983, Chapter 297, Section 17) is amended to read:

     "9-16-1. SHORT TITLE.--[Sections 17 through 29 of this act] Chapter 9, Article 16 NMSA 1978 may be cited as the "Regulation and Licensing Department Act"."

     SECTION 2. A new section of the Regulation and Licensing Department Act is enacted to read:

     "[NEW MATERIAL] ENFORCEMENT BUREAU--ENFORCEMENT AGENTS--PEACE OFFICERS.--

          A. The "enforcement bureau" is established within the office of the superintendent and shall be directed by a bureau chief appointed by the superintendent pursuant to Section 9-16-8 NMSA 1978 and who shall report to the superintendent.

          B. The department shall employ enforcement agents to enforce laws and administrative rules within the scope of the Cannabis Regulation Act.

          C. The bureau chief and enforcement agents employed by the department within the enforcement bureau shall be peace officers and shall have the powers and duties afforded peace officers. The enforcement agents shall report to the bureau chief. The superintendent shall be responsible for final employment decisions for enforcement agents. The bureau chief and enforcement agents shall meet the qualifications for certification pursuant to Section 29-7-6 NMSA 1978.

          D. The enforcement bureau shall investigate alleged violations of law and report its findings to the superintendent and the director of the cannabis control division of the department."

     SECTION 3. A new section of the Cannabis Regulation Act is enacted to read:

     "[NEW MATERIAL] ENFORCEMENT--DIVISION AND ENFORCEMENT BUREAU--ORDERS RESTRICTING MOVEMENT OF GOODS--EMBARGO AND RECALL, SEIZURE AND CONDEMNATION--PROCEDURES--PENALTIES.--

          A. The division and the enforcement bureau shall enforce the provisions of the Cannabis Regulation Act and may carry out announced and unannounced inspections.

          B. The division may:

                (1) respond to tips or allegations of wrongdoing or initiate an investigation on the division's own initiative of an alleged or suspected violation of the Cannabis Regulation Act; provided that the division shall refer possible criminal violations to the enforcement bureau and shall assist that bureau in investigations and inspections;

                (2) in the course of inspections conducted pursuant to this subsection, for the purpose of laboratory testing, collect and take custody of samples of items suspected to contain cannabis products when those items are suspected of being adulterated, dangerously or fraudulently misbranded or possessed in violation of the Cannabis Regulation Act or other laws of the state; and

                (3) issue an order restricting the movement of cannabis products that are or are suspected of being adulterated or dangerously or fraudulently misbranded.

          C. The enforcement bureau may:

                (1) embargo or take possession of a cannabis product reasonably suspected of being an illegal cannabis product or a cannabis product that is adulterated or so misbranded as to be dangerous or fraudulent;

                (2) take control pursuant to a warrant issued by a court of competent jurisdiction of the premises where a cannabis product is produced, manufactured or stored; and

                (3) petition the district court for injunctive or other equitable relief.

          D. The division shall give sufficient notice to the licensee of the division's decision to issue an order restricting the movement of the licensee's cannabis products. Such an order shall not be in place for longer than necessary to complete the division's or the enforcement bureau's investigation; provided that an order restricting the movement of misbranded cannabis products that are not considered dangerous or fraudulent shall last only as long as it takes the licensee to relabel and repackage the cannabis products as ordered by the division.

          E. The division may issue a recall order for cannabis products embargoed or subject to an order restricting movement due to adulteration or dangerous or fraudulent misbranding.

          F. When the enforcement bureau embargoes a cannabis product, the division shall affix or cause the licensee to affix to the cannabis product a tag or other appropriate marking giving notice that the cannabis product is or is suspected of being an illegal cannabis product or is adulterated or dangerously or fraudulently misbranded and that the cannabis product shall not be sold, removed or otherwise disposed of.

          G. When the enforcement bureau embargoes a cannabis product or seizes a cannabis product or a premises, the bureau shall give written notice to the licensee of the grounds for the embargo or seizure.

          H. Neither the division nor the enforcement bureau shall be required to care for embargoed or seized cannabis products.

          I. A licensee aggrieved by an embargo, seizure or recall undertaken pursuant to Subsection B, C or E of this section may request an administrative hearing within ten calendar days from the date that the embargo, seizure or recall was executed. The hearing shall be held before a hearing officer as provided by rule. The final agency decision may be appealed pursuant to Section 39-3-1.1 NMSA 1978.

          J. When the determination is made that an embargoed or seized cannabis product is illegal, adulterated or dangerously or fraudulently misbranded, the division shall petition the district court for condemnation of the cannabis product.

          K. If the district court orders condemnation, the department shall destroy the cannabis product at the licensee's expense. If the district court does not order condemnation, the enforcement bureau shall have the restrictive tags or markings removed and the affected products released or returned to the licensee or other owner of the products.

          L. The New Mexico department of agriculture, the department of environment and other state agencies with relevant knowledge and expertise shall cooperate with the division and the enforcement bureau at the regulation and licensing department's request.

          M. A person who intentionally, knowingly or recklessly:

                (1) removes, conceals, destroys or disposes of a cannabis product subject to an order restricting the movement or embargo is guilty of a fourth degree felony and shall be sentenced as provided in Section 31-18-15 NMSA 1978; and

                (2) sells, delivers or transfers a cannabis product subject to recall to another person is guilty of a fourth degree felony and shall be sentenced as provided in Section 31-18-15 NMSA 1978.

          N. In addition to the actions provided in this section, after an administrative hearing pursuant to the Uniform Licensing Act, the division may take disciplinary action against a licensee, including:

                (1) suspension or revocation of the license;

                (2) imposition of an administrative penalty not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per violation; or

                (3) any other disciplinary action allowed under that act or rule of the division.

          O. As used in this section:

                (1) "embargo" means to place in a secure location, accessible only by the licensee, the division and the enforcement bureau, that has continuous video monitoring; and

                (2) "enforcement bureau" means the enforcement bureau of the department."

     SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.--The effective date of the provisions of this act is July 1, 2025.

- 7 -


Legislators: Democratic sponsorship Republican sponsorship Bipartisan sponsorship This indicates your legislator
(Highlights bills they sponsor, committees they sit in)
Bill Rows: Active -- hearings scheduled (NN) - sequence number in agenda Inactive -- no hearings scheduled
Bill Progress: Passed Failed Vote Tabled
Incomplete Data: Heard(?)
(was scheduled for hearing recently)
Heard Long Ago
(was scheduled for hearing many days ago)
(There is very little I can do about these because nmlegis.gov does not report real-time results)

This site pulls data from nmlegis.gov but is in no way associated with that site or the state of New Mexico. It's just a labor of love by Ed.

Powered by Mojolicious. Tracking software is fully Open Source. See About page for more info, and for a list of recent changes.