Sat Mar 8 4:44PM - 13 days, 18 hours left in session

House Bill 149

Supported Decision-Making Act [view on nmlegis.gov]

Financial Analysis: FIR


Sponsors
Rep. Michelle Paulene Abeyta 69 Bernalillo, McKinley, Valencia, San Juan, Socorro & Cibola
Rep. Joanne J. Ferrary 37 Doña Ana
Rep. Charlotte Little 68 Bernalillo
Sen. Linda M. López 11 Bernalillo
Sen. William E. Sharer 1 San Juan

Status
HousePassed 64-0
SJC[Referred, not scheduled]
SFC


"Official" History

This is the official nmlegis action history. I'm doing my best to translate the LONG/WEIRD-STRING to something less gibberishy. And before you ask, no, the "Legis Day" number has no mapping to the real world.

Actions: [2] HJC/HAFC-HJC [5] DNP-CS/DP-HAFC [11] DP/a - PASSED/H (64-0)- SJC/SFC-SJC

Legis DayActionDetails
2 referred HJC/HAFC
2 sent HJC
5 passed HJC (view committee report) DNP-CS/DP ( view committee sub) 8-0
5 sent HAFC
11 passed HAFC (view committee report) DP/a 13-0
11 passed House 64-0
11 referred SJC/SFC
11 sent SJC


Abeyta, Michelle Pauleneyes Lujan, Tara L.absent
Anaya, Mariannayes Lundstrom, Patricia A.absent
Anyanonu, Janelleyes García, Miguel P.excused
Armstrong, Gailyes Sariñana, Debra M.excused
Baca, Brian G.yes Silva, Sarahexcused
Block, Johnyes Terrazas, Luis M.excused
Borrego, Cynthiayes  
Brown, Cathrynn N.yes  
Cadena, Micaela Larayes  
Cates, Kathleenyes  
Chandler, Christineyes  
Chatfield, Jackyes  
Chavez, Nicoleyes  
Chávez, Eleanoryes  
Cullen, Catherine J.yes  
De La Cruz, Artyes  
Dixon, Meredith A.yes  
Dow, Rebeccayes  
Duncan, Markyes  
Ferrary, Joanne J.yes  
Gallegos, Doreen Y.yes  
Garcia, Marthayes  
Garratt, Joyyes  
Gonzales, Anitayes  
Gurrola, Yanirayes  
Hall II, William A.yes  
Henry, Jonathan A.yes  
Hernandez, Joseph Franklinyes  
Hernandez, Joshua N.yes  
Herndon, Pamelyayes  
Herrera, Susan K.yes  
Hochman-Vigil, Dayanyes  
Johnson, D. Wondayes  
Jones, Jeniferyes  
Lara, Raymundoyes  
Lente, Derrick J.yes  
Little, Charlotteyes  
Lord, Stefaniyes  
Martinez, Alan T.yes  
Martínez, Javieryes  
Mason, Jimmy G.yes  
Matthews, Marianyes  
McQueen, Matthewyes  
Mejia, Angelitayes  
Mirabal Moya, Tanyayes  
Montoya, Rodyes  
Murphy, Mark B.yes  
Ortez, Kristinayes  
Parajón, Cristinayes  
Pettigrew, Randall T.yes  
Reeb, Andreayes  
Romero, Andreayes  
Romero, G. Andrésyes  
Roybal Caballero, Patriciayes  
Rubio, Angelicayes  
Sanchez, Josephyes  
Sena Cortez, Elaineyes  
Serrato, Lindayes  
Small, Nathan P.yes  
Szczepanski, Reenayes  
Thomson, Elizabeth "Liz"yes  
Torres-Velásquez, E. Dianeyes  
Vincent, Harlanyes  
Zamora, Martin R.yes  


This table shows bill actions detected on Ed's system, using heuristics that may not be 100% accurate and which may not reflect the "official" nmlegis chronology. It is probably more than you care to know.

Jan 28 filed: Supported Decision-Making Act
[new]
sent to HJC
actions: 'HPREF' -> '[2] HJC/HAFC-HJC'
new sponsor: Michelle Paulene Abeyta
new sponsor: Joanne J. Ferrary
Jan 29 scheduled for HJC on Mon Feb 3, 13:30
Jan 31 new sponsor: Charlotte Little
moved from HJC 02-03 13:30 to 2025-02-05 13:30
removed from HJC agenda Mon Feb 3, 13:30
added to HJC agenda on Wed Feb 5, 13:30
Feb 2 removed from HJC agenda Wed Feb 5, 13:30
added to HJC agenda on Wed Feb 5, 13:30
Feb 3 removed from HJC 02-05
removed from HJC agenda Wed Feb 5, 13:30
Feb 7 added to HJC agenda on Mon Feb 10, 13:30
Feb 11 passed HJC; sent to HAFC
actions: '[2] HJC/HAFC-HJC' -> '[2] HJC/HAFC-HJC [5] DNP-CS/DP-HAFC'
Feb 19 new sponsor: Linda M. López
Feb 22 new sponsor: William E. Sharer
Feb 26 scheduled for HAFC on Thu Feb 27, 13:30
Feb 28 passed HAFC; sent to Speaker's Table
actions: '[2] HJC/HAFC-HJC [5] DNP-CS/DP-HAFC' -> '+ [11] DP/a-T'
Mar 1 actions: '[2] HJC/HAFC-HJC [5] DNP-CS/DP-HAFC [11] DP/a-T' -> '[2] HJC/HAFC-HJC [5] DNP-CS/DP-HAFC [11] DP/a'
passed House; referred to SJC/SFC; sent to SJC
actions: '[2] HJC/HAFC-HJC [5] DNP-CS/DP-HAFC [11] DP/a' -> '+ - PASSED/H (64-0)- SJC/SFC-SJC'

Committee Substitution!

Showing the House Judiciary substitution below. For the original as introduced, please refer to nmlegis.


HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR

HOUSE BILL 149

57th legislature - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - first session, 2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AN ACT

RELATING TO HEALTH; ENACTING THE SUPPORTED DECISION-MAKING ACT; PROVIDING REQUIREMENTS FOR SUPPORTED DECISION-MAKING AGREEMENTS; PROVIDING DUTIES FOR SUPPORTERS; CREATING REPORTING REQUIREMENTS; CREATING A SUPPORTED DECISION-MAKING PROGRAM WITHIN THE OFFICE OF GUARDIANSHIP IN THE DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES COUNCIL; MAKING AN APPROPRIATION.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:

     SECTION 1. [NEW MATERIAL] SHORT TITLE.--This act may be cited as the "Supported Decision-Making Act".

     SECTION 2. [NEW MATERIAL] DEFINITIONS.--As used in the Supported Decision-Making Act:

          A. "adult" means a person who is at least eighteen

years of age; 

          B. "decision-maker" means an adult who seeks to enter, or has entered, into a supported decision-making agreement with one or more supporters pursuant to the Supported Decision-Making Act;

          C. "decision-making support" means assistance in understanding the options, responsibilities and consequences of a decision-maker's life decisions without making those decisions on behalf of the decision-maker;

          D. "supported decision-making agreement" means an agreement entered into between a decision-maker and a supporter pursuant to the provisions of the Supported Decision-Making Act; and

          E. "supporter" means an adult who has entered into a supported decision-making agreement with a decision-maker pursuant to the Supported Decision-Making Act.

     SECTION 3. [NEW MATERIAL] SUPPORTED DECISION-MAKING AGREEMENTS--SCOPE OF AGREEMENTS.--A decision-maker may voluntarily, without undue influence or coercion, enter into a supported decision-making agreement with one or more supporters under which the decision-maker authorizes the supporter to do any or all of the following:

          A. provide decision-making support;

          B. assist the decision-maker in accessing, collecting and obtaining information that is relevant to a given life decision, including medical, psychological, financial, educational or treatment records, from any person;

          C. assist the decision-maker in understanding the information described in Subsection B of this section; and

          D. assist the decision-maker in communicating the decision-maker's decisions to appropriate persons.

     SECTION 4. [NEW MATERIAL] SUPPORTED DECISION-MAKING AGREEMENT REQUIREMENTS.--

          A. A supported decision-making agreement may be in any form but shall:

                (1) be in writing;

                (2) be dated;

                (3) be signed voluntarily, without coercion or undue influence, by the decision-maker and the supporter;

                (4) designate a supporter;

                (5) list the types of decisions with which the supporter is authorized to assist the decision-maker;

                (6) list the types of decisions, if any, with which the supporter is not authorized to assist the decision-maker; and

                (7) contain a consent signed by the supporter indicating the supporter's:

                     (a) relationship to the decision-maker;

                     (b) willingness to act as a supporter; and

                     (c) acknowledgment of the duties of a supporter.

          B. Each party to a supported decision-making agreement shall sign the agreement in the presence of at least two adult witnesses or a notary public.

     SECTION 5. [NEW MATERIAL] PRESUMPTION OF CAPACITY.--

          A. All decision-makers are presumed to have capacity and to be capable of managing their affairs unless otherwise determined by a court. A diagnosis of mental illness, intellectual disability or developmental disability, of itself, does not void the presumption of capacity.

          B. The manner in which a decision-maker communicates with others is not grounds for determining that the decision-maker is incapable of managing the decision-maker's own affairs.

          C. The execution of a supported decision-making agreement may not be used as evidence of capacity or incapacity in any civil or criminal proceeding and does not preclude the ability of the decision-maker who has entered into a supported decision-making agreement to act independently of the agreement.

     SECTION 6. [NEW MATERIAL] SUPPORTER DUTIES AND AUTHORITY--SUPPORTER PROHIBITIONS.--

          A. A supporter shall:

                (1) act in good faith;

                (2) act with the care, competence and diligence ordinarily exercised by supporters in similar circumstances;

                (3) act only within the scope of authority granted in the supported decision-making agreement;

                (4) avoid self-dealing; and

                (5) support the will and preference of the decision-maker rather than the supporter's opinion of the decision-maker's best interests.

          B. A supporter is prohibited from:

                (1) making decisions on behalf of the decision-maker;

                (2) obtaining, without the consent of the decision-maker, information that is not reasonably related to matters with which the supporter is authorized to assist pursuant to the supported decision-making agreement; and

                (3) using, without the consent of the decision-maker, information acquired for a purpose other than assisting the decision-maker to make a decision under the supported decision-making agreement.

     SECTION 7. [NEW MATERIAL] SUPPORTER NOT A FIDUCIARY AGENT.--A supporter is not a fiduciary agent of the decision-maker.

     SECTION 8. [NEW MATERIAL] SUPPORTER DISQUALIFICATIONS.--The following persons are disqualified from acting as a supporter:

          A. an individual who is the subject of a civil or criminal order prohibiting contact with the decision-maker;

          B. an individual who has been placed on the state's employee abuse registry;

          C. an individual who has been convicted of a crime involving violence or dishonesty within the preceding ten years; and

          D. an individual who is currently incarcerated.

     SECTION 9. [NEW MATERIAL] ACCESS TO PERSONAL INFORMATION.--

          A. If a supporter assists a decision-maker in accessing, collecting or obtaining personal information, including financial information, protected health information under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 or educational records under the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, the supporter shall ensure that the information is kept privileged and confidential, as applicable, and is not subject to unauthorized access, use or disclosure.

          B. The existence of a supported decision-making agreement does not preclude a decision-maker from seeking personal information without the assistance of the supporter.

     SECTION 10. [NEW MATERIAL] THIRD PARTY RELIANCE ON SUPPORTED DECISION-MAKING AGREEMENT.--A person who receives an original or a copy of a supported decision-making agreement shall rely on the agreement.

     SECTION 11. [NEW MATERIAL] RECOGNITION OF DECISIONS MADE WITH ASSISTANCE OF SUPPORTER.--A decision or request made or communicated with the assistance of a supporter in conformity with the Supported Decision-Making Act shall be recognized for the purposes of any provision of law as the decision or request of the decision-maker.

     SECTION 12. [NEW MATERIAL] TERM OF SUPPORTED DECISION-MAKING AGREEMENT--TERMINATION OR REVOCATION OF AGREEMENT.--

          A. Except as provided by Subsection B of this section, the supported decision-making agreement extends until terminated by either party or by the terms of the agreement.

          B. The supported decision-making agreement is terminated as to a particular supporter if:

                (1) the adult protective services division of the aging and long-term services department finds that the decision-maker has been abused, neglected or exploited by the supporter;

                (2) the supporter is the subject of a civil or criminal order prohibiting contact with the decision-maker;

                (3) the supporter has been placed on the state's employee abuse registry;

                (4) the supporter has been convicted of a crime involving violence or dishonesty;

                (5) the supporter is incarcerated;

                (6) the decision-maker gives notice to the supporter orally, in writing, through an assistive technology device or by any other means or act showing a specific intent to terminate the agreement; or

                (7) the supporter provides written notice of the supporter's resignation to the decision-maker.

     SECTION 13. [NEW MATERIAL] REPORTING OF SUSPECTED ABUSE, NEGLECT OR EXPLOITATION.--If a person who receives a copy of a supported decision-making agreement or is aware of the existence of a supported decision-making agreement has cause to believe that the decision-maker is being abused, neglected or exploited by the supporter, the person shall report the alleged abuse, neglect or exploitation to the aging and long-term services department's adult protective services division's statewide intake hotline.

     SECTION 14. [NEW MATERIAL] SUPPORTED DECISION-MAKING PROGRAM--CREATED--PROGRAM DUTIES.--

          A. The "supported decision-making program" is created within the office of guardianship in the developmental disabilities council.

          B. The supported decision-making program may:

                (1) provide information to adults interested

in entering into supported decision-making agreements;                     (2) facilitate adults in forming, executing and terminating supported decision-making agreements;

                (3) monitor supported decision-making agreements to determine if the agreement meets statutory requirements;

                (4) provide resources and assistance for a decision-maker who believes a supporter is acting outside the scope of the supported decision-making agreement; and

                (5) provide resources to any individual who is seeking information on reporting suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation of the decision-maker.

     SECTION 15. APPROPRIATION.--Two hundred eighty-nine thousand dollars ($289,000) is appropriated from the general fund to the developmental disabilities council for expenditure in fiscal year 2026 to carry out the provisions of the Supported Decision-Making Act and to hire full-time employees and contract support to create and administer the supported decision-making program in the office of guardianship in the developmental disabilities council. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2026 shall revert to the general fund.

- 9 -


Legislators: Democratic sponsorship Republican sponsorship Bipartisan sponsorship This indicates your legislator
(Highlights bills they sponsor, committees they sit in)
Bill Rows: Active -- hearings scheduled (NN) - sequence number in agenda Inactive -- no hearings scheduled
Bill Progress: Passed Failed Vote Tabled
Incomplete Data: Heard(?)
(was scheduled for hearing recently)
Heard Long Ago
(was scheduled for hearing many days ago)
(There is very little I can do about these because nmlegis.gov does not report real-time results)

This site pulls data from nmlegis.gov but is in no way associated with that site or the state of New Mexico. It's just a labor of love by Ed.

Powered by Mojolicious. Tracking software is fully Open Source. See About page for more info, and for a list of recent changes.